There's been some speculation that in the US the difference in Covid deaths between "red" and "blue" areas will be enough to change some election results. It is true that red areas are seeing much higher death rates. This appears to be happening when one looks at data at both a state and county level. This is very likely due to lower vaccination rates among some Republicans and self-identified conservatives, and yet the majority of every major demographic political group, Republicans, Democrats, self-identified liberals, self-identified conservatives, and self-identified centrists, are vaccinated. At the same time, vaccination rates are lower among Republicans than among other groups, and a vocal minority of anti-vax Republicans are making it seem like a more common Republican position than it is.

However, it seems unlikely that the differences in vaccination rate, and thus death rate is enough to alter many elections. It could alter a close election, and that's especially likely in a Presidential election. Georgia was decided by a margin of a little under 12,000 votes, and has had around 30,000 Covid deaths. (There's some reason to think that Covid death totals are being undercounted, and that this undercount is especially strong in red leaning states and red counties of red states. But actually determining how much of an undercount this is seems very difficult). But despite that, it seems unlikely that Covid will by itself be enough to change a Presidential election.

What about Senate and House elections? This seems a bit more plausible, but the House is so gerrymandered that this doesn't seem to be that likely. And even aside from Gerrymandering, the Democrats are just really unpopular right now, and the generic congressional ballot looks bad for them.
Governor elections seem to tell a similar story. Virginia's off-year gubernatorial election was decided by about 60,000 votes, but that was after there was already an uptick in "red" voters dying, so that already bakes some of that in. Even if it didn't, Virginia has had around 16,000 Covid deaths, not enough to change an election result.

However, there are two unappreciated sets of elections where Covid deaths may have a major influence. Local elections have much lower turnout than state-wide or federal elections. And primaries have very low turnout also. More importantly, the data suggests that the most likely to be unvaccinated Republicans are one who are more conservative. Thus, this may mean that there will be fewer right-wing voters coming out to vote in primaries. Here, then the numbers do look a lot more plausible. Let's look again at the Virginia governor election, but this time at the primaries. The Republican governor was decided at a convention with a form of ranked choice ballot . But that's less important than the fact the total numbers are tiny. The final difference in the last round of elimination was 1182, which is tiny. If there's only a small number of conservative voters dying, that still can look drastically different. And that's before we get to how since there were six candidates in this election, it is potentially sensitive to the order of elimination in the various rounds. And the final round candidate who Youngkin beat, Pete Snyder, was noticeably to his right.

Other elections also look pretty close. The Republican senate primary in Alabama was decided by around 12,000 votes. Right now, about 16,000 people have died officially from Covid in Alabama. It would need to be an extreme ratio to have an influence on the election of that sort (especially because many of the initial deaths in Alabama have been among poor African-American communities, as well as in the major cities, and those people are not going to be right-wing anti-vax conservatives generally). But if that election were slightly closer, it starts looking pretty plausible.

Many other primary elections state and local offices have similarly low turnout. Obviously, this isn't universally the case, but it does seem to be common. If this pattern is enough, it may not change much in the way of general elections directly, but it may result in more moderate Republicans winning primaries. That may moderate the Republican party as a whole, but it might also help the Republican party itself, as more moderate candidates may be more likely to win general elections.
 During the ongoing COVID crisis, my family has been doing Zoom meetings on Saturday nights with Havdalah, the Jewish ritual ending the Shabbat. For most of those weeks, I, and occasionally other family members have shared thoughts about that week's Torah portion in an email with the Zoom link.  This week, I sent out that email early, and am including a slightly modified version of what I wrote for public consumption here. 
 
This week's Torah portion is Ki Teitzei, כִּי־תֵצֵא . The portion includes a broad variety of civil laws and related commandments. Two areas of note are the laws of war and laws of how to treat laborers.
 
The section on the laws of war, unlike the section in the previous portion concerning not doing environmental damage during war, is by modern standards at best antiquated and, to be blunt, repugnant. However, in the context when it was written, it seems there is an attempt to at least add some small amount of morality around  horrific practices.
 
The laws concerning laborers are easier for us moderns to sympathize and agree with. This week includes a commandment for the prompt payment of wages for labor. If one hires a person for a day, the wages must be paid that day, before sundown.   While the later Rabbis did allow for people to pay employees weekly or monthly, for example, they strongly endorsed the central message about paying wages on time.
 
Both of these notions together are particularly and sadly relevant as I write this. The United States employed hundreds, if not thousands of Afghans. And Afghanistan has fallen. We are doing little to help these people who are facing likely retribution at the hands of the Taliban. From both a perspective of ethical warfare, and a perspective of prompt compensation for those who worked for you, there is an obligation to help these people, to help get them out of Afghanistan and resettle them. One does not need the guidance of this week's Torah portion to see both the moral and pragmatic benefits to assisting these people who helped the US so much.
 
There is also a personally important aspect here. My grandfather Jakob Dronski  helped the Allies during World War II and its aftermath. Aaron has a letter he keeps on his desk, written by a member of the US military, testifying to Jakob Dronski's assistance, which he used to gain entry to the US, and eventual citizenship. At least at one point, the US seemed to know how to meet its moral obligations.
 
Unfortunately, the US government is doing little now, and what it is doing is slow. While the US federal government seems to be right now sadly lacking in support there are steps we as individuals can take. I have made a donation to Keeping Our Promise https://www.keepingourpromise.org/  which works to help resettle allies of the US from war-torn areas. They are right now focused on assisting people from Afghanistan.  Kabul has fallen, and it is past sundown of the day of that fall. If anything this makes our obligation all the more pressing. I encourage everyone to donate to Keeping Our Promise or similar groups.

Profile

joshuazelinsky

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930 31    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 07:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios